Each week in The Snapshot, we share data-driven insights, highlight new listings, and showcase our latest product updates.
Read on for the latest edition 👇
Tokenized U.S. T-bills may become one of the first crypto markets where incumbents get distribution before startups build durable moats.
Demand is no longer the main question. The category has grown quickly, but most products offer similar exposure to short-duration U.S. government debt.
That makes value capture harder. As differentiation shifts from the asset itself to brand, distribution, reliability, security, scale, and fees, incumbents like BlackRock, Fidelity, and J.P. Morgan are well positioned.
Startups can still build valuable businesses, but the stronger opportunity may be serving customers and use cases incumbents cannot or will not prioritize.
1) Demand is no longer the question
Tokenized U.S. T-bills have grown into a multi-billion dollar market. Across assets tracked by Token Terminal, circulating market cap now stands at $13.3B. Crypto-native issuers helped prove demand for onchain dollar yield. Incumbents like BlackRock, Fidelity, and J.P. Morgan are now entering with products built for larger distribution channels.
Recent filings show incumbents are targeting stablecoin reserve use cases. This month, BlackRock’s OnChain Shares and J.P. Morgan’s JLTXX were filed as tokenized money market products intended to qualify as eligible reserve assets for stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act.
Stablecoin reserves could become a larger distribution channel than crypto-native yield demand alone. Large asset managers and banks already have relationships with institutions, custodians, stablecoin issuers, and treasury desks. If tokenized U.S. T-bills become reserve infrastructure, those relationships could matter more than early product innovation.
2) The big TAM illusion
Tokenized U.S. T-bills appear to have a large addressable market. Tokenized products represent $13.3B in market cap, compared to $6.6T of outstanding short-duration U.S. T-bills. That makes the traditional market roughly 496x larger than the tokenized market today.
Large markets built around similar products often favor scale. Most tokenized U.S. T-bill products offer exposure to the same underlying asset: short-duration U.S. government debt. When everyone is buying similar government debt at similar yields, differentiation moves away from the asset itself. Brand, distribution, reliability, security, scale, and low fees start to matter more.
That creates a difficult setup for standalone issuers. The category can keep growing, but growth alone does not guarantee defensible margins or proprietary distribution. The better the market performs, the more attractive it becomes for large asset managers and banks to enter. That could make it harder for smaller, crypto-native issuers to compete on product alone.
3) What happens next
Crypto-native issuers may still find product-market fit by serving users incumbents are less optimized for. Ondo Finance’s USDY is one example: it has meaningful market cap and one of the largest holder bases among tokenized U.S. T-bill products. Its access model is oriented toward qualifying non-U.S. onchain users, while products like BUIDL are built for qualified institutional investors.
The key question for startup issuers is which customers they can serve better than incumbents. Crypto-native firms, DAOs, global users, wallets, exchanges, and API-first products may need operating models traditional asset managers are not built to serve. Broader access, faster integrations, collateral mobility, and 24/7 usability could become points of differentiation. This creates room to compete on how tokenized U.S. T-bills are used versus who issues them.
Tokenized U.S. T-bills could become infrastructure while applications own the user relationship. Competing with BlackRock, Fidelity, or J.P. Morgan on trust, scale, liquidity, and institutional distribution is structurally difficult. Startups may instead capture value by building wallets, exchanges, lending platforms, and more. The largest opportunity may come from making tokenized capital useful onchain, not replacing incumbents as issuers.
Explore the full dataset here.
Most projects with liquid tokens do not provide regular, standardized reporting to their stakeholders. Token Terminal's reporting initiative exists to close this gap, giving investors the data to evaluate onchain businesses on fundamentals rather than narratives alone.
Token Terminal publishes standardized quarterly reports covering key financial and operational metrics alongside qualitative commentary from the respective core team. Quarterly reports are now rolling out for Q1 2026.
Featured report: TRON Q1 2026
More from Q1 2026
“There is a structural shift in how institutions interact with DeFi, and the growth of some of the early curators alongside the emergence of new curators coming from a more traditional finance background is welcomed.”
“The shift toward tokenized asset volume, which nearly tripled QoQ to $224.86m, represents an intentional strategic direction.”
“The key signal is that capital became more productive, not less. While TVL declined alongside broader market deleveraging, fee generation remained nearly flat.”
Aave April 2026 Report
In addition to quarterly reports, Token Terminal publishes a monthly report on Aave as part of its Data Partnership with Aave Labs.
April's report covered a month shaped by the KelpDAO rsETH bridge exploit and the DeFi United recovery effort that followed. The Aave Labs team also weighs in directly, contextualizing the event.
If you're evaluating how to formalize your project's data and reporting strategy, get in touch.
Platform updates
Listed several euro stablecoins, including EURI, EURe, REUR, and dEURO, bringing Token Terminal's coverage of euro stablecoins to $774.2M in combined market cap.
Listed Grove, a capital allocator that draws stablecoins from Sky and deploys them into yield-bearing positions across tokenized treasuries, private credit, and DeFi lending. Grove currently has $3.1B in TVL.
Listed Steakhouse Financial, a risk curator offering vault products across multiple DeFi lending protocols. Steakhouse Financial currently has $1.9B in TVL.
Listed Sentora with basic metrics, a risk curator managing lending vaults across Morpho, Euler, and Kamino.
Added coverage of Aave V4, including TVL, active loans, fees, and revenue. Aave V4 currently has $56.4M in TVL and $19.3M in active loans.
Added TVL and active loans metrics for USDai, an issuer that generates yield by lending to early-stage AI companies. USDai currently has $359.7M in TVL and $104.9M in active loans.
Interested in getting listed? Read more here.
Token Terminal now features three dedicated pages for tracking tokenized assets, onchain yields, and agentic payments.
Tokenized assets
Tokenized assets - The race to tokenize capital markets is accelerating, and tracking who's winning requires access to granular, real-time data. The page has been expanded with dedicated subsections for RWAs, U.S. T-bills, credit funds, stocks, ETFs, and euro stablecoins, with more coming. Coverage currently spans 3,332 assets with a combined market cap of $342.3B.
Yields
Yields - Demand for yield-bearing onchain assets is growing, but these products do not calculate yield in a standardized way. This page covers APY across 350+ tokens on 100+ chains, computed directly from onchain data in a consistent and comparable manner. Coverage spans tokenized funds, liquid staking tokens, and lending deposit tokens, with more to follow.
Agentic payments
Agentic payments - As AI agents begin transacting autonomously, a new category of onchain commerce is emerging. This page tracks stablecoin transfers initiated by AI agents on the x402 protocol: $52.0M in cumulative transfer volume, 192.0M cumulative transfers, and 191.7K monthly active agents across Base, Solana, and Polygon.
All three datasets are actively expanding. If you're an asset issuer, yield protocol, or building agentic payment infrastructure and your product isn't covered yet, get in touch.
The authors of this content, or members, affiliates, or stakeholders of Token Terminal may be participating or are invested in protocols or tokens mentioned herein. The foregoing statement acts as a disclosure of potential conflicts of interest and is not a recommendation to purchase or invest in any token or participate in any protocol. Token Terminal does not recommend any particular course of action in relation to any token or protocol. The content herein is meant purely for educational and informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as financial, investment, legal, tax or any other professional or other advice. None of the content and information herein is presented to induce or to attempt to induce any reader or other person to buy, sell or hold any token or participate in any protocol or enter into, or offer to enter into, any agreement for or with a view to buying or selling any token or participating in any protocol. Statements made herein (including statements of opinion, if any) are wholly generic and not tailored to take into account the personal needs and unique circumstances of any reader or any other person. Readers are strongly urged to exercise caution and have regard to their own personal needs and circumstances before making any decision to buy or sell any token or participate in any protocol. Observations and views expressed herein may be changed by Token Terminal at any time without notice. Token Terminal accepts no liability whatsoever for any losses or liabilities arising from the use of or reliance on any of this content.
Stay in the loop
Join our mailing list to get the latest insights!